Out of all three renditions of Hamlet I have come to the conclusion that Mike Almereyda’s version is of most interest to me. This rendition is the most recent and takes place in a modern day setting. I feel that this is a great form of expressing the story of Hamlet. Firstly, I believe that this version is unique and interesting in the fact that it represents Denmark and Elsinore castle in the form of a company, where Hamlet is the son of the deceased CEO. I also believe that Mike Almereyda expresses Hamlets first soliloquy in a unique and inventive way. In fact, I believe his method provides more of a mode and insight into Hamlet’s true feelings through his reflection of videos with him and his father. One similarity between the original Hamlet and the film is the language used.
I feel that in this movie, Hamlet was portrayed most effectively. I feel so because he is properly shown as a young man in mourn of his father’s death. He seems to perfectly fill the role of the character originally described by Shakespeare. If I were to ask the director to make one change to the film, I would recommend he do similar to Franco Zeffirelli’s version of Hamlet. In that version, Franco preludes to the play with providing a scene of Hamlet’s father’s death. I believe that Mike’s film would greatly benefit a similar scene. A detailed scene of the death of the CEO of Denmark Corp. in the beginning of the film would greatly improve the production.
I agree, his interpretation is quite interesting. Check out the entire movie, I'll lend it to you if you like. My issue was with the rest of the cast. Bill Murray didn't give Polonius justice and Julia Stiles didn't dig deep enough for Ophelia's character.
ReplyDelete